Home » News » Persona Non Grata

Persona Non Grata


The Finnish-Russian Civic Forum (FINROSFORUM) promotes cooperation between the peoples of Finland and Russia by supporting civic initiatives for democracy, human rights, and free speech.

Archives

The Norwegian Helsinki Committee has released a new report, Persona Non Grata: The CIS Ban System for Human Rights Defenders and Journalists. The report shows that over the past several years, countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) have developed a common system reminiscent of the Schengen system in Europe, where individuals who are denied entry to one of the six member states automatically are denied entry to the others.

The countries of the CIS are Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. Parallel with this Joint System, many CIS countries have increased the practice of “blacklisting” certain foreign nationals involved in human rights work and journalism. Such decisions are usually made by the security services of the country in question, and those who are barred in this manner are neither provided with a reason for the ban, nor given any means of appeal.

Usually, bans are imposed for periods as long as 5 or 10 years, and have proven difficult or impossible to remove once in place, even when requests are made through diplomatic channels and international organizations. In addition, most CIS countries also administer national lists of journalists and representatives of non-governmental organizations who are barred from entering the country. These lists also include citizens of other CIS countries.

These practices must be seen as attempts of the states to limit contact between human rights activists at home with their colleagues abroad, as well as to limit unwanted scrutiny and investigation of potential human rights violations. Such actions are contrary to article 2 of the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders according to which states are committed to take all necessary steps to ensure that the rights of human rights defenders are effectively guaranteed.

For journalists and representatives of international non-governmental organizations working in the sphere of human rights and democracy this system represents a potentially dramatic curb on their ability to carry out their work. The CIS ban system has been granted limited attention by international organizations such as the United Nations, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), and the European Union.

Even though these organizations and states occasionally respond to restrictive practices of banning entry to human rights defenders and journalists, there is clearly a need for a more systematic approach to the problem. Too much depends on the efforts of the individuals targeted to have his or her case raised. There is a need for effective procedures and mechanisms to respond to these threats against international human rights activism.

http://www.nhc.no/php/?module=article&view=1029


Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: